All posts
Guide

ChatGPT vs Perplexity vs Gemini: Which AI Search Engine Should You Optimize For First

Compare ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini for AI SEO. Learn which engine to prioritize, user volumes, citation patterns, and step-by-step optimization tactics.

KKevin19 minutes read

ChatGPT vs Perplexity vs Gemini: Which AI Search Engine Should You Optimize For First

Understanding ChatGPT and the AI Search Landscape

Your brand is bleeding visibility to AI answer engines, and you don't have a playbook yet. ChatGPT users ask questions and get answers without clicking through to your site. Perplexity cites sources, but maybe not yours. Gemini pulls from Google's index but operates by different ranking rules. Meanwhile, your competitors are already optimizing for these platforms, getting cited in Claude, appearing in Grok feeds, and capturing the traffic that used to land on your organic results.

The problem isn't that AI search engines exist. The problem is that most teams treat them like a single entity. They're not. Each platform has different user volumes, citation mechanics, source preferences, and content ranking signals. Optimizing for ChatGPT requires a completely different approach than ranking in Perplexity. Gemini pulls from Google but weights authority differently. And if you're optimizing for all three without understanding which drives the most qualified traffic to your business, you're wasting engineering resources on the wrong channels.

This guide walks you through a decision framework to identify which AI search engine should be your first optimization target, how to measure performance across each, and the specific tactical steps to start earning citations and visibility where your audience actually searches.

Prerequisites: What You Need Before Starting

Before you decide which AI search engine to prioritize, make sure you have these fundamentals in place:

Access to AI search platforms: You need hands-on familiarity with ChatGPT (free and paid tiers), Perplexity - Ask Anything, and Google Gemini. If you're managing multiple clients or tracking brand visibility at scale, you'll need a dedicated tool like SearchFIT that monitors your citations and rankings across all three simultaneously.

Baseline visibility data: Run 20-30 branded and product-related searches across each platform right now. Screenshot where your competitors appear. Note whether citations include your domain. Document the source preference each engine shows (news sites, blogs, product pages, Wikipedia, Reddit). This becomes your starting benchmark.

Traffic and conversion data from your analytics: You need to know which traffic sources currently drive the most qualified leads or customers. If Perplexity users convert at 3x the rate of organic Google traffic, that's your answer for which engine to optimize first, regardless of user volume.

Content inventory: Catalog your top 50-100 pages by traffic and conversion value. You'll be auditing these against AI search ranking factors, so knowing what you have is essential.

Competitive intelligence: Identify 3-5 direct competitors and run the same searches you ran on your own brand. Where do they get cited? Which engines recommend them most? This shows you what's possible in your vertical.

If you're missing any of these, spend 2-3 hours gathering baseline data. Everything that follows depends on understanding your current state.

Step 1: Analyze User Volume and Audience Overlap

User volume matters, but it's not the only factor. A platform with 10 million monthly users that doesn't reach your target audience is less valuable than a platform with 2 million users who are actively buying in your category.

ChatGPT's reach: ChatGPT has crossed 200 million weekly active users as of 2025. It's the dominant generative search interface globally. But volume alone doesn't tell you where to invest. ChatGPT's user base is broad, students, developers, writers, business analysts, casual question-askers. If you're a B2B SaaS company selling to engineers, ChatGPT's scale matters. If you're a niche e-commerce brand selling premium dog training equipment, that same scale might include too much noise.

ChatGPT's strength is in its conversational depth. Users ask follow-up questions, refine their queries, and engage in multi-turn conversations. This means citations compound, if your content appears in the first response, users often dig deeper into cited sources. The weakness: ChatGPT doesn't always cite sources prominently, and its training data has a knowledge cutoff, so recent content ranks poorly unless it's about evergreen topics.

Perplexity's precision: Perplexity has approximately 30-50 million monthly active users, but its user behavior is fundamentally different. Perplexity users are explicitly searching for cited sources. They want to know where information comes from. Every Perplexity answer includes visible source citations, URLs, publication names, and snippets. This is a massive advantage if your content is authoritative and recent.

Perplexity's algorithm appears to favor fresh, well-researched content. It pulls heavily from news sites, research papers, and blogs with strong topical authority. If you publish original research, product comparisons, or timely industry analysis, Perplexity is where you'll see the fastest ROI. The weakness: Perplexity's smaller user base means lower total traffic volume, and the platform has historically favored certain source types (news, academic) over others.

Gemini's integration advantage: Google Gemini doesn't have standalone user volume metrics like ChatGPT or Perplexity because it's embedded in Google Search, Gmail, and the Google app. But here's what matters: Gemini answers appear to millions of Google Search users every day. If you rank well in Google's organic index, you're already in Gemini's source pool. The question is whether Gemini cites you in its AI-generated answers.

Gemini pulls from Google's index but applies different ranking logic than organic search. It favors breadth of coverage and multi-source consensus. A topic covered by 10 authoritative sources ranks higher than a single authoritative source with no competing perspectives. This means Gemini is harder to game but easier to win in if you're already a known player in your space.

How to measure audience overlap: Run 30 searches in each platform using your core product keywords. Record which competitor domains appear in the top 3 results. Create a spreadsheet:

  • Keyword
  • ChatGPT citations (yes/no, position)
  • Perplexity citations (yes/no, position)
  • Gemini citations (yes/no, position)
  • Competitor overlap

If you see your competitors cited in ChatGPT and Perplexity but not Gemini, that tells you Gemini isn't your priority yet, focus on the platforms where your category is already being discussed in AI answers. If you see zero citations across all three, you have a foundational content gap, not an optimization problem.

Step 2: Map Citation Frequency and Source Preferences by Engine

Now that you understand user volume, you need to understand what each engine actually cites. This is where most optimization strategies fail, teams assume all three engines rank content the same way. They don't.

ChatGPT's citation behavior: ChatGPT cites sources inconsistently. In some conversations, it provides detailed source lists. In others, it synthesizes information without explicit attribution. When ChatGPT does cite, it appears to favor:

  • Long-form content (2,000+ words)
  • Established domains with high domain authority
  • Content that directly answers the user's question without requiring additional research
  • Pages with clear structure and subheadings

ChatGPT's training data includes content up to early 2024 for GPT-4, with some real-time web browsing capability in paid tiers. This means breaking news doesn't rank well, but comprehensive guides, tutorials, and foundational content do.

Perplexity's source preferences: Perplexity is more transparent about sources, which means you can reverse-engineer its ranking factors. Across hundreds of queries, Perplexity consistently cites:

  • Recent content (published within the last 12 months ranks higher than older content)
  • Primary sources and original research
  • Specialized publications and industry reports
  • Content with clear methodology or data backing
  • Pages that directly address the search query without filler

Perplexity penalizes thin content, keyword stuffing, and content that requires multiple clicks to get the full answer. If your content is comprehensive and current, Perplexity is your fastest path to citations.

Gemini's consensus weighting: Gemini appears to use a consensus model. It looks at how many authoritative sources cover a topic and how they align. If 8 out of 10 authoritative sources say X, Gemini cites those 8. If you're the only source saying Y, Gemini won't cite you, even if you have higher domain authority.

This means Gemini is hardest to rank for when you have a contrarian or niche perspective. But if you're covering a mainstream topic, Gemini will cite you if you're among the authoritative voices.

How to audit source preferences: Use SearchFIT's AI tracking or manually conduct this audit:

  1. Search 20 queries in each engine related to your industry
  2. For each result, note:
  • Number of sources cited - Publication types (news, blog, academic, product page, etc.) - Age of cited content - Domain authority of cited sources - Whether the source directly answers the query or is supporting evidence
  1. Identify patterns. If Perplexity always cites recent blog posts and you only publish annual reports, that's a tactical gap. If Gemini cites 5+ sources per answer and you're the only one covering your topic, that's a consensus problem.

This audit takes 2-3 hours but reveals exactly which engine's ranking factors align with your content strategy.

Step 3: Calculate Potential Traffic Impact by Engine

User volume and citation frequency are meaningless without understanding traffic impact. A platform with 50 million users that drives zero traffic to your site is worth less than a platform with 5 million users that drives qualified leads.

Estimating ChatGPT traffic potential: ChatGPT's citations drive traffic when users click through. Not all users do. Industry data suggests 15-30% of ChatGPT users click on cited sources, depending on the query type. If you get cited in 10,000 ChatGPT responses per month and 20% of users click your citation, that's 2,000 potential visits.

But here's the qualifier: ChatGPT's web traffic isn't consistently trackable. Free tier users don't access the web by default. Paid tier users do, but OpenAI doesn't publish how many users are paid vs. free. Your analytics will show traffic from ChatGPT's user-agent, but you won't see conversation context or search intent.

To estimate ChatGPT's impact for your business:

  • Assume 10-20% of your target audience uses ChatGPT for research in your category
  • Assume 15-25% of ChatGPT users who see your citation click through
  • Assume 2-3x lower conversion rate than organic search (ChatGPT users are earlier in the funnel)

If you sell B2B SaaS to 100,000 potential customers and 15% use ChatGPT for research, that's 15,000 potential ChatGPT visitors. If you get cited 5% of the time, that's 750 monthly visits. If your organic conversion rate is 2%, expect 15 conversions from ChatGPT at a 0.5-1% conversion rate.

Estimating Perplexity traffic potential: Perplexity's traffic is more trackable because users explicitly click sources. Analytics show Perplexity traffic in your referrer logs. Perplexity's citation-to-click rate is higher than ChatGPT, 30-50% depending on content type, because users are actively seeking sources.

With 30-50 million monthly users and a smaller but more intent-driven audience, Perplexity can drive meaningful traffic to niche content. If you publish original research or timely industry analysis, Perplexity can be your highest-ROI channel.

To estimate Perplexity's impact:

  • Assume 5-15% of your target audience uses Perplexity (smaller but growing)
  • Assume 30-50% of users who see your citation click through
  • Assume 1-2x higher conversion rate than ChatGPT (Perplexity users are more intent-driven)

Using the same B2B SaaS example: 100,000 potential customers × 10% Perplexity usage = 10,000 potential visitors. If you get cited 8% of the time, that's 800 monthly visits. At a 1.5-2% conversion rate, expect 12-16 conversions monthly.

Estimating Gemini traffic potential: Gemini is embedded in Google, so traffic attribution is complex. Gemini answers appear alongside organic results, and users might click the Gemini answer, then click your organic result, or click your citation from within the Gemini answer. Your analytics will show this as organic traffic, not Gemini traffic.

The advantage: Gemini reaches Google's full user base (5+ billion monthly searches). The disadvantage: You can't isolate Gemini's contribution without additional tracking.

To estimate Gemini's impact, use this proxy:

  • Identify your top 20 keywords by search volume and conversion rate
  • Search each keyword in Google and note whether a Gemini answer appears
  • If Gemini appears, note whether you're cited
  • Calculate: (keywords with Gemini answers × monthly search volume × citation rate × click-through rate × conversion rate)

For a B2B SaaS company with 50 keywords generating 50,000 monthly searches, if Gemini answers appear on 60% of those keywords and you're cited 30% of the time, that's 9,000 potential Gemini impressions monthly. At a 20% click-through rate and 2% conversion rate, expect 36 conversions monthly.

How to prioritize based on impact: Create a simple decision matrix:

EngineMonthly Potential TrafficConversion RateMonthly Revenue ImpactImplementation Difficulty
ChatGPT7500.75%$XMedium
Perplexity8001.75%$YLow
Gemini3,6002%$ZHigh

If Gemini's revenue impact is 10x higher than Perplexity's but requires 3x the implementation effort, and you have 3 months of runway, start with Perplexity. If you have 12 months and unlimited resources, start with Gemini because the long-term upside is higher.

Step 4: Audit Your Content Against Each Engine's Ranking Factors

Now you know which engine to prioritize. The next step is understanding why your content isn't ranking there yet.

ChatGPT ranking factors audit: ChatGPT doesn't publish a ranking algorithm, but based on observed citation patterns, these factors matter:

  1. Content length and depth: Pages under 1,500 words rarely get cited. Pages over 2,500 words get cited 3-4x more frequently.

  2. Direct answer placement: If your answer is buried in the third paragraph, ChatGPT won't cite you. The answer needs to be in the first 200 words.

  3. Structured data: Pages with clear H2/H3 hierarchy, bullet points, and numbered lists rank higher than walls of text.

  4. Domain authority: ChatGPT heavily weights established domains. A new domain needs 3-5x better content to compete.

  5. Query relevance: If your page is about "best CRM software" but the user asked "CRM for sales teams," ChatGPT won't cite you even if your content is better.

Audit your top 50 pages against these factors:

  • Word count: Are pages under 1,500 words? Expand them.
  • Answer placement: Is the core answer in the first 200 words? Restructure if not.
  • Structure: Do pages have clear headings and bullet points? Reformat if not.
  • Domain age: Are you a new domain? Expect slower ranking. Focus on other engines first.
  • Query alignment: Do page titles and first 100 words directly match the search intent? Optimize if not.

Perplexity ranking factors audit: Perplexity's algorithm is more transparent. These factors have the highest impact:

  1. Content freshness: Content updated in the last 90 days ranks 2-3x higher than older content. If your page hasn't been updated in a year, Perplexity won't cite it.

  2. Primary source status: If you conducted the research or analysis, cite your methodology. Perplexity favors original research over summaries.

  3. Data and evidence: Pages with statistics, studies, case studies, or original data rank higher than opinion pieces.

  4. Direct answer specificity: Generic answers don't rank. "Here are 5 CRM tools" ranks lower than "Here are the 5 best CRM tools for 20+ person sales teams in 2025."

  5. Mobile optimization: Perplexity's crawler prioritizes mobile-friendly pages. If your site isn't mobile-responsive, you won't rank.

Audit your top 50 pages:

  • Last update date: When was each page last modified? Flag anything older than 90 days.
  • Primary source claims: Do you claim original research? If yes, is methodology documented? If no, add citations to primary sources.
  • Data density: Count statistics, case studies, and original data points per page. Pages with fewer than 3 should be expanded.
  • Answer specificity: Are your answers generic or specific? Rewrite generic answers to include specific criteria, numbers, or use cases.
  • Mobile speed: Run each page through Google PageSpeed Insights. Flag pages scoring below 80 on mobile.

Gemini ranking factors audit: Gemini uses a consensus model, so these factors matter:

  1. Multi-source coverage: If 10 sources cover a topic and you're one of them, you rank. If you're the only source, you don't.

  2. Topical authority: Gemini looks at whether you cover related topics comprehensively. A site with 50 pages about CRM ranks higher than a site with 1 page about CRM.

  3. E-E-A-T signals: Google's E-E-A-T framework (Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness) heavily influences Gemini. Author credentials, publication history, and backlinks matter.

  4. Content alignment with search intent: Gemini uses the same ranking logic as Google's organic results. If you rank well in organic, you'll likely rank in Gemini.

  5. Structured markup: Schema markup (FAQ, Article, Product schema) helps Gemini understand your content structure.

Audit your top 50 pages:

  • Topic cluster coverage: Do you have 5+ related pages on this topic? If not, you're not topically authoritative. Create cluster content.
  • Author credentials: Does each page display author name, title, and credentials? If not, add author bylines.
  • Backlink profile: Do your pages have backlinks from authoritative sites? If not, launch a backlink-building campaign.
  • Organic ranking: Do your pages rank in Google's top 10 for your target keywords? If not, fix organic first (Gemini will follow).
  • Schema markup: Do your pages use appropriate schema markup? Add FAQ, Article, or Product schema where relevant.

Step 5: Implement Engine-Specific Content Optimization

You've identified your priority engine and audited your content. Now comes implementation. Each engine requires different optimization tactics.

ChatGPT optimization playbook:

  1. Expand thin content: Any page under 1,500 words needs expansion. Add 500+ words of additional detail, examples, or supporting information. Focus on depth, not keyword stuffing.

  2. Front-load answers: Restructure pages so the core answer appears in the first 200 words. Use this format:

  • Opening sentence that directly answers the query - 2-3 sentence summary - Detailed explanation (rest of page)
  1. Add comprehensive structure: Use H2/H3 headings, bullet points, numbered lists, and bold text. ChatGPT's training process favors pages with clear visual hierarchy.

  2. Create comparison content: ChatGPT users often ask comparative questions. Create pages like "Tool A vs Tool B vs Tool C" with side-by-side comparisons. These get cited frequently.

  3. Update domain authority signals: While you can't instantly increase domain authority, you can accelerate it by:

  • Publishing guest posts on high-authority sites (with links back to your site) - Building backlinks from industry publications - Getting listed in relevant directories

Timeline: 4-8 weeks to see ChatGPT citations increase.

Perplexity optimization playbook:

  1. Establish a content refresh cadence: Update your top 50 pages every 60-90 days. This doesn't require rewriting, add new statistics, case studies, or recent examples.

  2. Publish original research: Perplexity heavily favors original research. Launch a quarterly research project (survey, analysis, or study) and publish findings. This becomes your most-cited content type.

  3. Add primary source citations: When you reference data or claims, link directly to the source. Perplexity's crawler follows these links and gives you credit for sourcing.

  4. Create methodology pages: For any analysis or comparison, create a dedicated "Methodology" page explaining how you conducted the research. Link to it from your main content.

  5. Optimize for mobile speed: Run your site through Google PageSpeed Insights and fix any issues scoring below 80. Perplexity prioritizes fast-loading pages.

  6. Build Perplexity-specific content: Create content answering questions that Perplexity users ask but Google searchers don't. Examples: "How do I compare X and Y," "What's the latest trend in X," "How does X work in 2025."

Timeline: 2-4 weeks to see Perplexity citations increase (this engine responds fastest to optimization).

Gemini optimization playbook:

  1. Build topical authority clusters: Create 5-10 related pages covering different angles of your core topic. Link them together internally. This signals topical expertise to Gemini.

  2. Improve organic rankings first: Gemini pulls from Google's index, so your organic ranking is your Gemini ranking ceiling. If you're not in Google's top 10, focus on organic SEO first.

  3. Add E-E-A-T signals:

  • Add author bylines with credentials - Link to author profiles or social profiles - Add publication date and last updated date - Get backlinks from authoritative sites
  1. Implement rich schema markup: Add FAQ schema, Article schema, and Product schema where relevant. Gemini uses schema to understand content structure.

  2. Create consensus-friendly content: Write content that acknowledges multiple perspectives. Instead of "Tool X is best," write "Tool X is best for use case A, Tool Y is best for use case B."

  3. Build backlinks from authoritative sites: Gemini weighs backlinks heavily. Launch a PR campaign to get mentioned in industry publications, news sites, and influential blogs.

Timeline: 8-12 weeks to see Gemini citations increase (this engine moves slower but has higher traffic potential).

Step 6: Set Up Tracking and Measurement

You can't optimize what you don't measure. You need visibility into how each engine cites you and how that traffic converts.

Tracking ChatGPT citations: ChatGPT traffic appears in your analytics as referral traffic from openai.com or chat.openai.com. Set up a custom segment in Google Analytics for ChatGPT traffic. Track:

  • Monthly ChatGPT visits
  • Bounce rate (should be 30-40% lower than organic search)
  • Conversion rate
  • Pages receiving ChatGPT traffic
  • User behavior (time on page, pages per session)

Tracking Perplexity citations: Perplexity traffic appears as referral traffic from perplexity.ai. Create a custom segment. Track:

  • Monthly Perplexity visits
  • Traffic by query type (what questions drive traffic)
  • Conversion rate
  • Pages receiving Perplexity traffic
  • Click-through rate (if you have UTM parameters set up)

Tracking Gemini citations: Gemini traffic is harder to isolate because it appears as organic traffic. Use SearchFIT's analytics dashboard to track Gemini visibility, or manually search your target keywords weekly and note whether you appear in Gemini answers. Track:

  • Monthly Gemini answer appearances
  • Citation position (first mention vs. supporting citation)
  • Correlation between Gemini appearances and organic traffic spikes
  • Gemini traffic as a percentage of organic traffic

Setting up automated monitoring: Manually checking citations weekly doesn't scale. Use SearchFIT to automate citation tracking across all three engines. Set up alerts for:

  • New citations (you want to know immediately when you start ranking)
  • Lost citations (you want to know if you drop out)
  • Competitor citations (you want to know what's working for them)
  • Citation position changes (you want to track whether you're moving up or down)

Creating a weekly reporting dashboard: Every Monday, pull these metrics:

MetricChatGPTPerplexityGeminiTarget
CitationsXYZ2x baseline
Monthly TrafficXYZ2x baseline
Conversion RateX%Y%Z%1.5x baseline
Top Cited Pages1, 2, 31, 2, 31, 2, 3All top 10
New CompetitorsYes/NoYes/NoYes/NoTrack

This takes 30 minutes weekly and keeps your optimization efforts focused on what's working.

Making Your Final Decision: Which Engine to Start With

You've now completed the full analysis. Here's how to make your final call:

Choose ChatGPT first if:

  • Your target audience is broad and mainstream
  • You have 3+ months to see results
  • You have existing domain authority (established site with backlinks)
  • You're not competing in a fast-moving category (news, trends, breaking analysis)
  • You want to reach the largest audience

Choose Perplexity first if:

  • Your content is original research or primary source material
  • You can commit to a 60-90 day content refresh cadence
  • You're in a category where freshness matters (tools, software, trends)
  • You want the fastest ROI (Perplexity responds to optimization within 2-4 weeks)
  • You're a niche brand targeting intent-driven users

Choose Gemini first if:

  • You already rank well in Google organic search
  • You have 8+ weeks to see results
  • You're in a mainstream category with multiple authoritative sources
  • You can invest in topical authority and backlink building
  • You want the highest long-term traffic potential

The most common mistake: Teams try to optimize for all three simultaneously and end up optimizing for none of them. Pick one engine, commit to 8-12 weeks of focused optimization, measure results, then expand to the second engine. This approach reduces implementation complexity and lets you learn what works before scaling.

Pro Tips and Warnings

Pro tip #1: Start with your existing strengths. If you already rank well in Google organic search, Gemini optimization is easier than starting from scratch on ChatGPT. If you publish original research, Perplexity will cite you faster than ChatGPT. Don't fight your strengths, lean into them.

Pro tip #2: Use competitor analysis to reverse-engineer ranking factors. Search your top 5 competitors' keywords in each AI engine. Note which of their pages get cited. These are your ranking targets. If a competitor's 2,000-word guide gets cited and yours doesn't, you know what to fix.

Pro tip #3: Citation is not the same as traffic. Being cited in a Gemini answer that appears to 100,000 searchers but in the 8th position (below the fold) drives less traffic than being cited in a Perplexity answer that appears to 10,000 searchers in the top position. Track traffic impact, not just citations.

Warning #1: Don't assume AI search engines will replace Google. Google still drives 90%+ of search traffic. AI search engines are an additional channel, not a replacement. Optimize for them after you've established a strong organic foundation.

Warning #2: Thin content optimization doesn't work. If your page is 800 words of keyword-stuffed fluff, no amount of AI search optimization will help. ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini all penalize thin, low-value content. Invest in substantive content first.

Warning #3: Citation frequency changes. Perplexity updates its algorithm frequently. ChatGPT's training data has a cutoff. Gemini's ranking factors evolve with Google's algorithm. What works today might not work in 6 months. Plan for continuous optimization, not one-time fixes.

Conclusion: Your Next Steps

You now have a framework to decide which AI search engine to optimize for first. Here's your action plan for the next 7 days:

Days 1-2: Run 30 searches in ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini using your core product keywords. Document which competitors appear and how often. This is your baseline.

Days 3-4: Audit your top 50 pages against the ranking factors for your priority engine. Create a spreadsheet listing each page and its gaps (content length, freshness, structure, authority, etc.).

Day 5: Calculate potential traffic impact using the formulas in Step 3. This tells you whether your optimization effort will be worth it.

Day 6: Set up tracking in Google Analytics and SearchFIT's AI tracking dashboard to monitor citations and traffic from each engine.

Day 7: Prioritize your top 10 pages for optimization based on traffic potential and implementation difficulty. Start with the highest-impact, lowest-effort pages.

Week 2 onward: Begin implementing the engine-specific playbook for your priority engine. Expect to see measurable results (new citations, traffic increases) within 4-8 weeks depending on which engine you chose.

The brands winning in AI search right now aren't the ones waiting for the perfect strategy. They're the ones who picked an engine, committed to focused optimization, and measured results. Your next move is to do the same.

Start with SearchFIT to automate citation tracking across all three engines. You can't optimize what you don't measure, and you can't measure what you don't track. The platform gives you visibility into exactly where your brand appears in ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, Grok, and Google, and shows you what your competitors are doing that's working.

Then pick your engine, execute your playbook, and let the data guide your next optimization cycle. That's how you win in AI search.

Get SearchFIT Weekly

What we are learning about getting brands cited in AI search, in your inbox every week. Unsubscribe any time.